We acquired certain AS-JS series equipment from Airsep Corporation in the amount of US$1, 802, 685. The equipment never produced the capacity promised by Airsep. in fact, it never produce more than the 10% of the capacity that we needed. In trying to address this issue, Mr. Luis Contreras indicated thta the issue was not with the equipment, but rather one of pressure, and recommended that us acquire additional equipment from Airsep in order to increase pressure to needed levels. We made the required deposit of US$23, 500 for such pressure equipment. In analizing the issue further, we determined that the problem was not the pressure but rather the equipment itself. Airsep was given the required parameters by us and sold an equipment that did not meet our needs. We returned the equipment and has asked that the original payment and the deposit be remitted to it as soon as possible. In late October 2009, Mr. Luis Contreras indicated that Airsep (Ravinder K Bansal)would credit the equipment for the purchase of new equipment at 80% of the amount paid by us. This is not a satisfactory result for us. Furthermore, Mr. Luis Contreras explained that the deposit would not be returned until after IRS was notiied of the return of such sale and the IRS returned all taxes paid by Airsep in connection with such sale. This too is unsatisfactory for us.