HughesNet
5 stars | | (0) |
4 stars | | (0) |
3 stars | | (0) |
2 stars | | (0) |
1 stars | | (210) |
|
Category: Other
Contact Information Virginia, United States
|
HughesNet Reviews
|
June 6, 2007
Extremely poor service
Wish I had read these reviews before I started with Hughesnet. Could not download my business mls with this company. I called them constantly asking for help but they could not resolve the issues. I stuck it out for over a year and finally was able to cancel. I then mailed back the parts they asked for but never did receive the $300 as promised by them. Would you believe they had me working with level 4 tech. Says alot for their service. I could be on the phone for HOURS testing with a tech. I almost knew how to do his job. They changed our settings so many times that we were unable to get any signal at all. Don't even want to hear there name. BEWARE, this company should be under investigation. They take your $ and pass the buck. I now have WildBlue and have not had any problems at all.
|
|
June 2, 2007
Slow connection speed
Stunned at the number of sources and complaints against HughesNet. I just tested my HughesNet connection speed... 12 kb per second... about the slowest internet service provider in America... so much for fast download speeds.
|
|
June 1, 2007
HughesNet sucks!
Are you kidding me? My HughesNet runs at 2Kb or about 14 times slower than dial-up, yet costs $60 a month. I can cancel my 15 month contract at a cost of $700, so you figure it out.
The installer was so fat he couldn't climb on the roof so he charged me $132.50 which is a scam for the installer to make extra money, to install a pole into the ground. He told me to make the check out to him personally, not to Millennium Satellite. I was a DirecTV installer and am well aware of this scam. The rebate program requires copies of my invoice but I don't get an invoice. instead my business ATM card is charged every month, so the rebate is a scam too.
So what's my recourse? I tell you how to get even with these bastards. Sue them in small claims court. It will cost you about $50 to file; you don't need a lawyer, but guess what? THEY DO! They're a corporation. So they spend at least $500 to defend themselves or lose by default. First you have to give them a chance to make good, so do that first. When you're not satisfied, sue them. The installer too.
|
|
May 28, 2007
Lies about cost
I was lied about cost installer was suppose to show me how to use he was late and took hours to install. I was told he would show me how to use he did not i was told cost would be 49/month after 1 payment of 102 dollars when i got my second bill it was for 102 when i call they said i had to pay that for 15 month i was not told that when i told to cancel they said that they where going to charge me 700 dollars.
|
|
May 23, 2007
Poor service and default of contract to provide adequate bandwidth
HughesNet client for 1 year now. I am a WISP Operator (Wireless Internet Service Provider).
When I first elected to utilize HughesNet at our NOC (Network Operations Center) HNS's service was not pitted against SkyBlue SISP (Satellite Internet Service Provider) in a competitive selling frenzy of a very finite resource which Hughes refuses to supplement.
In the last 6 months since HughesNet began going toe-to-toe with SkyBlue- and from then on HNS service to it's customers began to degrade on a daily basis.
At our NOC we have three .98meter commercial based systems from HughesNet, each site was originally contracted to provide 2MB/512Kbps Upstream/Downstream bandwidth. As of the last 3 weeks two of my VSAT's can barely provide a downstream speed of 700Kbps, a far cry from 2MB!
Since HNS began its competition against SkyBlue the FAP (Fair Access Policy) has undergone extensive hacking- not at all what I originally contracted for in the beginning. Not to mention that the network is extremely oversold in it's present condition. NOW according to HNS's FAP that has been radically re-authored states that HNS only has to provide UP TO 2MB downstream and UP TO 500Kbps upstream. YES, HNS changed their bandwidth provision in between FAP re-writes from 2MB/512 to 2MB/500. I don't recall receiving an addendum to my HNS contract which I had to sign agreeing to the new conditions! How on earth can I be held accountable when HNS refuses to be held accountable itself?
Last week while on the phone with HNS customer support I asked the valid question of how little did HNS have to provide? The rep informed me that the downstream speed could drop to as low as 500Kbps and the upstream speed would likely see 38Kbps.
Rather than throw a few OC3 connections onto an already overburdened system HNS elected to punish its clients with a newly revised FAP. In the days of DirecWay the FAP would throttle a user to a 1/3 of dialup (18Kbps) for 6-12 hours once he/she reached the allotted bandwidth transfer of 200MB.
Now that HughesNet has stepped in over DirecWay the FAP is really ugly! Now once a user reaches his/her bandwidth allotment of 200MB your account is throttled to 0Kbps for up to 24 hours, not a lick of bandwidth will come through your pipeline under this condition. This is not fitting into the scheme of things for my business as I am in the business of providing reliable connections wirelessly to my clients, except when HNS decides to FAP my system that is!
With 3 "Small Business" packages including 3 public IP blocks my company pays HNS roughly $750 for services monthly.
Just this morning I canceled service from 2 of the three HNS systems as I am going to deploy a fiber connected back-haul from Temecula to Anza where our NOC is.
When asked why I am cancelling, my replies to the HNS rep were:
* The two earthstations I ordered decommissioned this morning failed to be externally ping-able over 70% of the time therefore making access to my portals for wireless clients to log onto the Internet impossible most times.
* Extremely poor downstream speed, lately when I run bandwidth tests I am lucky to see 720.4Kbps.
* By depending on HughesNet as my primary bandwidth provider is hurting my business in a very bad way!
As I was informed by the rep at HNS that I would be penalized $300 early service termination fees for each of the two HNS systems I had decommissioned totaling $600! I informed the rep that I would not pay that fee as I am being punished for jumping ship from a provider that can't provide a dependable connection and it was hurting my business.
My question is how can I defete HNS and their $600 charge they claim they will send to HARD COLLECTIONS!
This is literally insane!
I mean come on folks, if I can't provide a usable service to you- how do I justify monetarily penalizing my client when he/she cancels service due to my failure to provide said services?
Also might I suggest what an un-named HNS billing department employee strongly suggested to forum users at www.broadbandreports.com to do... Get your credit card off of the payment system at HNS IMMEDIATELY! Call in and tell them you want to be placed onto Invoice Billing, it will cost you $5 a month more for this service, but is a far cry better than trying to get HNS to refund money to your credit card after and erroneous charge has been placed on it as this regularly does happen. Just call once a month and ask to pay by check to ensure service continuance.
One client mentioned by the HNS billing rep was steaming mad when he saw a $500 charge for service from HNS, not so bad you say huh? This person didn't even know who HNS was let alone own a HughesNet system to attain SISP from!
Regards
Pat Taylor
|
|
May 15, 2007
HughesNet is a fraud and sham!
Where do I start?
HughesNet is a fraud and a sham. In 2002 I subscribed to DirectWay for my Home business. I have NO other “access” to high speed internet (especially with Hughes Net) that raids my wallet on a monthly basis for 800% of the coats of dial up.
Currently my speeds are 36 Kps up and 20 kps down, slower that dial up. Guess what? I can’t even get thru to cancel. I spend hours on hold waiting for a tech only to be disconnected. Hughes email “Tech Support” DOES NOT WORK!. The domain to which these emails are sent is replied as “invalid”.
There is no responsiveness on their part. I was told that “You complain too much” by someone with a think Indian accent. What’s up? Am I just a wallet that HughesNet sucks out of? Why is there no tech support? Why can’t you cancel your account? Why does the State of California not care or investigate this?
|
|
May 5, 2007
Too expensive for what you get
I cant believe this fair access policy that they have. limited to 200 MB per 24 hour period. This is a joke when you consider that the equipment is around $500.00 and then its like 69.00 per month for 800kb to 1.0 mb (maybe) download rates. As soon as DSL is available... IM GOING TO RUN FROM THIS CRAP!
|
|
April 22, 2007
Unfair access policy
Check out the new Hughesnet "Fair Access Policy". If you use too much bandwidth than your plan allows, they shut you down. That's not new, but the punishment period is! If you exceed your bandwidth, they close down your net for a full 24 hours. Yep, if you accidentally go over your limit, you have to wait an entire day before you have your internet back.
Oh pardon (Hughesnet would be quick to remind you), you DO have internet, just at reduced speeds. Reduced speeds? Try TWO kilobytes per second. No, I'm not exaggerating; we get 2-3 kbps when we're subject to FAP (Fair Access Policy). I surfed faster in the 1980s.
The kicker? Hughesnet doesn't tell you when you're approaching your limit. There's no real-time way to look it up. And they don't provide any means of estimating how much bandwidth you might be using, when it resets, or when it might run out. Lastly, there's a nice clause about how they can keep your net shut down if you "continue bandwidth-intensive activities" while you're subject to FAP.
... So basically, Hughesnet can just shut down my internet for as long as they want, without any warning, without any conceivable way of me knowing when that's going to occur.
Great plan, guys. You need to be sued.
Hughnet's new FAP (as of April 2007) reads in part:
"The Fair Access Policy is straightforward. Based on an analysis of customer usage data, Hughes has established a download threshold for each of the HughesNet service plans that is well above the typical usage rates. Subscribers who exceed that threshold will experience reduced download speeds for approximately 24 hours.
During this recovery period, the HughesNet service may still be used, but speeds will be slower. Web browsing, for example, will be significantly slower than subscribers’ normal browsing experience. Subscribers will return to normal download speeds after the recovery period as long as they minimize their bandwidth-intensive activities. If they continue these activities during this recovery period, reduced download speeds may continue beyond 24 hours."
|
|
April 10, 2007
Dealing with HughesNet was a huge mistake!
We had decided to go with this company boy was this a mistake! We have had the service for about 8 or 9 months and it has been nothing but a hassle. First off they contract a company to set up the equipment and I guess the company had a couple jobs to do that day and screwed up when they put in the equipment it was under another persons name. We have tried to the rectify the problem and thought we did... 5 months down the line we have problems getting online it seems as though this account is under this other persons name... we will just call him "Arthur" but we are getting billed. The same contractors were called out to fix the problem (it took 2 months to get back online!) We had service again and everything seemed to be fine. April 9th we received an invoice stating that we owed 591.91 by 5/2... I WAS PISSED! So I called and inquired about the invoice, they said that in Feb. I had canceled my account that was the charges... commitment termination and hardware fee WHATEVER! so anyways, when you call they ask for you acct# and I gave them the one on the invoice in front of my face and needless to say I was on the phone for over 2 hours talked to 4 different people and what I yes I figured out was that this acct# belonged to "Arthur" but got sent to my address and was in my name don't know why and that on the service page of the Hughesnet site thing my serial # to the modem and my account # were different from the account # on the statement they have this all clusterf**ked! I told them that since opening an account with them it has been nothing but an inconvenience... they don't care and it's still not resolved the last 2 times I was on hold forever it seemed and then afterwards they say you'll be contact within 24 to 48 hrs... I have 3 case #'s and a wasted day. NO PROBLEM RESOLVED and still very unhappy, thanks Hughesnet!
|
|
February 6, 2007
Poor broadband service
I've had Hughes Satellite Broadband since August 2005. I thought I would have faster connections and downloads. Not so. The connection speed is terrible. I wait and wait, usually my request is timed out. Have I called tech support? Yes, many times, and it usually improves for a bit. However they always bill on time.
|
|
RECENTLY UPDATED REVIEWS
Payforhomework for education
Barb Ahern | Coaching for Women
REQUESTED REVIEWS
REVIEWS BY CATEGORY
|